Historic (albeit futile), House Judiciary Committee moves forward with impeachment.

Politics

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/impeachment-inquiry-12-13-2019/index.html

It was another big day in the impeachment inquiry into President Trump as the Judiciary Committee approved articles of impeachment.

Here’s where things stand today:

  • What happened: After a lengthy day of debating the two articles of impeachment against Trump, abuse of power and obstruction of congress,the House Judiciary Committee voted to approve both articles. The vote fell on partisan lines: Democrats voted yes and Republicans voted no, with the exception of Ted Lieu, a Democrat who was absent because of illness.
  • Yesterday: The vote was supposed to be held yesterday but was unexpectedly delayed by House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, a decision that underscored the partisan tensions throughout the impeachment inquiry.
  • What’s in the articles: The first article of impeachment accuses Trump of abusing his office by pressuring Ukraine to investigate his political rivals and withholding US security aid and a White House meeting. The second accuses him of obstructing the investigation into his misconduct by blocking witnesses and disobeying subpoenas.
  • What’s next: The two articles of impeachment will now go to the House floor for a vote. If a simple majority of the House votes to approve either article, Trump will become the third president ever formally impeached — President Nixon resigned after the votes passed the House Judiciary Committee but before they could make it to the full House. The House has yet to set a specific date for the full impeachment vote, but two Democratic leadership aides said it could happen on Wednesday.
  • Possible trial: Then the Republican-led Senate will hold a trial presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The White House is still planning its trial strategy and considering whether or not it will call witnesses, which may lengthen the trial. Trump said earlier that “I wouldn’t mind the long process because I’d like to see the whistleblower — who is a fraud.”

6 min ago

Schumer on a potential impeachment trial: We will render “impartial justice”

From CNN’s Phil Mattingly

Chuck Schumer speaks during a press conference at the US Capitol in Washington, December 10, 2019.
Chuck Schumer speaks during a press conference at the US Capitol in Washington, December 10, 2019. Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement following this morning’s vote in the House Judiciary committee on the article of impeachment:“If articles of impeachment are sent to the Senate, every single senator will take an oath to render ‘impartial justice.’ Making sure the Senate conducts a fair and honest trial that allows all the facts to come out is paramount.”

No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Politics
Carrizo shows his hand, recognizes Mulino as true threat. “He won’t debate, I won’t debate”.

https://www.laestrella.com.pa/panama/politica/carrizo-desafia-a-mulino-si-no-asiste-al-debate-yo-tampoco-IY7001831 José Raúl Mulino has not participated in any presidential debate or organized forum where all the presidential candidates have been summoned The presidential candidate of the Democratic Revolutionary Party, José Gabriel Carrizo, did not mince words when expressing his position regarding participation in the last presidential debate. In a …

Politics
Zulay steamed as plug pulled in the middle of her rant!! Kinda funny though.

As she was talking about “double standards”, her mic was cut. Kinda good timing. https://www-laestrella-com-pa.translate.goog/panama/politica/zulay-rodriguez-denuncia-que-le-apagaron-el-microfono-en-el-conversatorio-sobre-libertad-de-expresion-YI6903643?_x_tr_sl=es&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=sc According to Rodríguez, they turned off her microphone when she began to explain about the double agendas In the intervention of the presidential candidate for free nomination, Zulay Rodríguez, in the conversation on freedom of …

"JB"
US policy on Haitian immigrants carries the waft of racism given the current situation.

OP ED: by “JB”- Before all the REDS freak out, let me clarify. I am NOT in favor of recklessly open borders with anyone being able to enter the US unchecked or undocumented. In the same way I am NOT in favor of it here, and mention DARIEN probably more …